NCAA ruling on Brendan Sorsby opens the door wide open on Big 12 race
May 26, 2026, 4:21 PM | Updated: 4:34 pm
LUBBOCK, TEXAS - APRIL 17: Brendan Sorsby #2 of the Texas Tech Red Raiders passes during the Texas Tech Spring Game at Jones AT&T Stadium on April 17, 2026 in Lubbock, Texas. (Photo by Ron Jenkins/Getty Images for ONIT)
(Photo by Ron Jenkins/Getty Images for ONIT)
SALT LAKE CITY — On Tuesday, the NCAA ruled to deny Brendan Sorsby’s request for eligibility reinstatement for the 2026 season. As teams begin the summer phase of the season offseason, the Big 12 race was already expected to be competitive, this adds another significant variable to the conference picture.
Sources: The NCAA has denied Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby’s request for reinstatement for eligibility for the 2026 season. Sorsby has completed his 35-day in-patient rehab for his gambling addiction at Algamus in Goodyear, Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Ts1p3juEI9
— Pete Thamel (@PeteThamel) May 26, 2026
According to multiple reports, the NCAA denied Sorsby’s request for reinstatement. Sorsby is still seeking relief through the legal process, so the situation is not necessarily final. However, this seems to be a pretty black and white case, where reinstatement seems highly unlikely. Meaning, Texas Tech will have to prepare for the season without its most important offseason addition.
For the Big 12, this matters because Texas Tech entered the offseason as the league’s most established contenders. The Red Raiders won the 2025 Big 12 championship, reached the College Football Playoff and appeared positioned to remain near the top of the conference. Adding Sorsby was expected to help maintain that standing.
Now, there is more uncertainty around that projection.
What Texas Tech loses without Brendan Sorsby
Sorsby was not just another transfer addition. He brought starting experience, proven production and a skill set that fit what Texas Tech needed at quarterback.
His time at Cincinnati showed that he could operate a Big 12 offense, extend plays with his mobility and provide enough downfield passing ability to make the offense difficult to defend. For a Texas Tech roster with strong overall talent, that kind of quarterback stability was important.
Without Sorsby, the Red Raiders still have a roster capable of competing at a high level. But the quarterback position becomes much less settled. That does not remove Texas Tech from the Big 12 race, but it does change the way the Red Raiders should be evaluated.
The difference is not only about talent. It is about certainty. A proven quarterback allows a team to withstand difficult road games, close conference games and uneven stretches over the course of a long season. If Texas Tech has to turn to a less experienced option, the margin for error narrows.
Sorsby statement in part from IG: “If I’m blessed and fortunate enough to have the opportunity to continue my college career at Texas Tech, I know I will get the support I need, including through the school’s Center for Students in Addiction Recovery. I am deeply sorry to… pic.twitter.com/ycINial6c2
— Pete Thamel (@PeteThamel) May 26, 2026
Texas Tech still has options
Texas Tech is not without alternatives. Will Hammond is one of the main names to watch, though his recovery from a torn ACL adds another layer to the situation. Kirk Francis and Lloyd Jones III also give the Red Raiders other options in the quarterback room.
That depth matters. Texas Tech has recruited and built its roster well enough that the season does not depend on one player alone. The Red Raiders should still have enough talent around the quarterback position to remain competitive in the Big 12.
The question is whether they can operate with the same level of consistency.
If the quarterback play is solid, Texas Tech can still contend for a return trip to the Big 12 championship game. If the position becomes uneven, the Red Raiders could come back toward the rest of the top half of the conference.
That is where the ruling affects Utah, BYU, and others in the Big 12 race.
A more open Big 12 race
The broader takeaway is that the Big 12 race looks less settled than it did before the ruling.
Texas Tech still belongs in the contender conversation because of its roster, coaching staff and recent success. But without Sorsby, the Red Raiders become more difficult to project. That matters in a conference where quarterback play is likely to separate the top tier from the rest of the league.
Utah, BYU, Arizona State, Kansas State, Iowa State and others all have reasons to believe they can be part of the race. The difference between those teams may be narrow. Quarterback stability, schedule breaks, health and late-season execution could decide the final standings.
Sorsby’s situation does not define the entire Big 12 season, but it does remove some clarity from the top of the league.
What it means for BYU
The Cougars do not play Texas Tech in the regular season, so the impact comes through the standings rather than a direct matchup. Many viewed BYU as the top competitor to Tech in the league, and some have already moved BYU ahead of Tech in post-spring outlooks.
BYU’s path to the Big 12 championship game depends on building off its 2025 season and proving that it can remain in the upper tier of the league. The Cougars have enough difficult conference games that their own performance will ultimately determine where they finish.
Still, Texas Tech’s quarterback uncertainty changes the surrounding context.
If Texas Tech is operating with Sorsby, the Red Raiders project as one of the league’s most stable teams. If they are not, BYU has one less established team to chase. That does not mean the Cougars become a favorite by default, but it does make the league picture more balanced.
BYU still has to manage its own schedule, and show that last season’s success can carry over. But in a race where several teams could finish within a game of each other, any reduction in certainty for a top contender is relevant.
What it means for Utah
Similarly, Utah also does not play Texas Tech during the regular season, so the impact is indirect. The Utes were not going to have an opportunity to change the head-to-head picture against the Red Raiders before a possible Big 12 championship game.
Utah’s own questions remain the most important part of its season. Devon Dampier has to continue developing as the leader of the offense. Kevin McGiven’s system has to show that it can produce more consistency. The offensive line has to come together, and the defense has to remain strong through a coaching transition and personnel changes. Utah has to handle the BYU rivalry game in Salt Lake City.
Nothing about Sorsby’s situation changes those internal priorities.
Without a clear frontrunner and little margin for error, the Utes, Cougars, and others will be competing in a more crowded race where two or three losses could still keep a team in position for the Big 12 title game. In that sense, Sorsby’s situation does not change Utah’s schedule, but it could change the shape of the standings Utah is trying to climb.
The Bottom Line
The NCAA’s ruling on Brendan Sorsby does not guarantee a major drop-off for Texas Tech, and it does not automatically elevate Utah or BYU into the Big 12 championship game.
What it does is add uncertainty. Texas Tech still has enough talent to compete for the conference title, but losing a proven quarterback changes the projection. The Red Raiders’ ceiling may still be high, but their floor becomes harder to define.
For Utah and BYU, the impact is indirect but meaningful. Neither team plays Texas Tech in the regular season, but both are competing in the same standings race. If the Red Raiders are less stable at quarterback, the path to the top two becomes more realistic for the rest of the conference.
That does not change what Utah and BYU have to do. They still need to handle their own schedules, get consistent quarterback play and survive a demanding Big 12 season. But it does make the conference race more open.
